<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonwoven Messenger Bags. Are they Green?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/10/02/jetline-does-it-again-nonwoven-messenger-bags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/10/02/jetline-does-it-again-nonwoven-messenger-bags/</link>
	<description>Green &#38; Sustainable Business Ventures: For Entrepreneurs &#38; Investors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Simonetta</title>
		<link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/10/02/jetline-does-it-again-nonwoven-messenger-bags/comment-page-1/#comment-13394</link>
		<dc:creator>John Simonetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopreneurist.com/?p=670#comment-13394</guid>
		<description>R Zupancic is correct. I made an error when writing the article. The Value Nonwoven bag is EQP $0.99 (see http://proformagreen.com/eco-shopper.shtml).

The Value Nonwoven Messenger bag was EQP $1.99 (now $2, see http://proformagreen.com/eco-messenger-poly.shtml)

I apologize if this caused any confusion. 

Another thing to mention is the thrust of the article was are nonwoven bags green. We now know that most nonwoven bags are indeed #5 plastic and recyclable wherever #5 plastic is accepted. 

See http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/01/04/nonwoven-is-a-number-5-plastic-who-knew/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R Zupancic is correct. I made an error when writing the article. The Value Nonwoven bag is EQP $0.99 (see <a href="http://proformagreen.com/eco-shopper.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://proformagreen.com/eco-shopper.shtml</a>).</p>
<p>The Value Nonwoven Messenger bag was EQP $1.99 (now $2, see <a href="http://proformagreen.com/eco-messenger-poly.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://proformagreen.com/eco-messenger-poly.shtml</a>)</p>
<p>I apologize if this caused any confusion. </p>
<p>Another thing to mention is the thrust of the article was are nonwoven bags green. We now know that most nonwoven bags are indeed #5 plastic and recyclable wherever #5 plastic is accepted. </p>
<p>See <a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/01/04/nonwoven-is-a-number-5-plastic-who-knew/" rel="nofollow">http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/01/04/nonwoven-is-a-number-5-plastic-who-knew/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Zupancic</title>
		<link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/10/02/jetline-does-it-again-nonwoven-messenger-bags/comment-page-1/#comment-13337</link>
		<dc:creator>R Zupancic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopreneurist.com/?p=670#comment-13337</guid>
		<description>The article is incorrect. It states &quot;For example we sell the Value Nonwoven Messenger Bag at $0.99 with one color imprint for a minimum run of 200 bags.&quot; The Value Nonwoven Messenger bags start at $2.00.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is incorrect. It states &#8220;For example we sell the Value Nonwoven Messenger Bag at $0.99 with one color imprint for a minimum run of 200 bags.&#8221; The Value Nonwoven Messenger bags start at $2.00.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

